NO XS4ALL
Here is what has happened to me in March 1998 on the Nettime list. Believe me or not I was removed from the list by its moderator and founder, "free media guru" Geert Lovink, without a warning, against my will, just because I expressed my own opinion of being worried about situation in Kosovo, when four Yugoslavian policemen were killed and two wounded by the so called Kosovo Liberation Army (then qualified by the USA, German and Austrian officials as terrorist organization). After asking Lovink why my reply to some participants of the discussion was not published after 18 hours, he informed me in cold blood that he has unsubscribed me. Soon after Lovink's poodle dogs, other two "free and open media gurus" Andreas Broeckmann and Pit Schultz expressed a fool support for his act.
I can not describe how I felt in that moment, shocked by such unfair, uncivilized, fascist act, considering Nettime list being a place (proclaimed so) for open communication, discussion, free exchange of different opinions - "xs4all". Lovink unsubscribed me silently, informing me about that off list, thinking that others will never know. But soon I sent my reaction to everybody directly, and to some other lists. I found out later in the Nettime archives that there were voices on the list who supported my discussions and opposed my removal.
Here you can find documented the final message from Lovink, my reaction to it, and how some others reacted.
For more details check at the Nettime archive pages.
your reply
was on nettime bye, geert Censorship
on Nettime - BRAVO Geert Geert Lovink wrote: > your reply was on nettime BRAVO Geert,
Subject: Kosovo: short
reply to all
Richard:
I sent this material to all Nettimers. Since I am disconnected from the list I can not follow your possible reactions to this. But please, if you think it is unfair to exclude somebody just like this, please react. But be careful,
tomorrow Big Brother could unsubscribe YOU too. !!!!!
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 1998 01:06:21
+1100 (EST)
this is precisely what's unique about this mode of communication it's totally cyber, without being self-referential to the whole cyber wank tendency in lists To: nettime-l {AT} basis.Desk.nl
While there is a strong electronic network of diaspora Albanians (see bit.listerv.albanian), it is unlikely that the Kosovars have the capacity to relay images and reports through Internet media. For this reason, a list like nettime seems to have an important role to play in encouraging a wider dissemination of information. From: "Robert Simon"
<robertms {AT} euronet.nl>
> Nettime ought to relate
to cyberspace in some way. If I can't disagree with this strongly enough. The fundamental way nettime relates to "cyberspace" (in Kantian terms, nettime's condition of possibility) is that the discussion is taking place in/on/over/by virtue of the internet, not that there are people writing about or discussing "interesting uses of information technology", possibilities which are available to me [in far different ways] at my local newspaper stand, or over a conference telephone line, or over dinner with friends, or by pasting little notes to a bulletin board. What is more of an interesting use of information technology than to (be able to) hear (read) a list participant offer a spontaneous, non-official, local (self-avowed "Serbian") view (I'm referring to A. Tisma here) of the situation in Kosovo? And to be offered very serious critical reponses to this (F. Rodriquez for one); to have the opportunity to take part in the discussion? No I don't think nettime should become a list exclusively for the discussion of regional politics, and I can't imagine that it will become that. And do most of us read everything posted to the list anyway? I'm used to seeing lots of different related and unrelated postings happening here all at once, and I'm always doing my own filtering. I doubt if threads concerning tennis or tropical fish would have much of a life here, list moderators notwithstanding, and I do support strategic 'official' intervention against wild flamewars, fascist propagandizing and protracted, high level noise, not because I can't ask someone to shut up or use my own delete button, but because I see a certain minimal and hopefully transparent level of 'official' list maintainence work as being necessary. In this case however, the postings on Kosovo have remained quite civil and to my mind informative, on all sides. Moreover, nettime isn't being monopolized by Kosovo discussions, and the opportunity is always there to raise some related issues specifically regarding net practices and possibilites (which is what I'm doing now). But let's face it, if the list can't on its own keep roughly "on topic", which is to say, remain viable as a fluid community of shared interests--whatever these may be--then it is no longer viable as a list. Robert Simon Date: Sun, 15 Mar 1998 02:41:10
+0100From: ANDREJ TISMA
<aart@eunet.yu> Dear Mr. Simon, From: "Robert Simon"
<robertms@euronet.nl> The opinion I expressed on nettime concerning your postings has not changed. Very sorry to hear that you were unsubscribed from the list. Robert
right decision, geert. i think we are no therapy station for wanna-be nazis. in the end chauvinism just attracts more attention than some average art work. so andrej had his fun, finally. /p Date: Sat, 07 Mar 1998 13:22:11 +0100 From: ANDREJ TISMA <aart@eunet.yu> Organization: Happiness X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.0 [en] (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pit Schultz <pit@uropax.contrib.de> CC: geert@xs4all.nl, abroeck@v2.nl Subject: Re: Censorship on Nettime - BRAVO Geert Pit Schultz wrote: > right decision, geert.
i think we are no therapy station for wanna-be Pit, Andrej --
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 1998 15:15:00
+0100 (MET) Andreij, well, good
that we do this dialogue in private. anyway i always like to take back
such words, spoken out in a kind of accumlating flames. the problem is
that the historical constellation is problematic, same as the situation
now, and years before i was not reacting while bosnia was bombed etc.
so it is also a kind of insecurity of the people outside, to stay on the
wrong side, or no side at all. noone wants to be in favor of war. identity
and culture wars, especially at the background of dispersed cultural groups,
mikronations like slovenia, all that is not very easy to understand from
a distance. best regards
dear andrej, >And all those Albanian
separatists whom you have published on Nettime - actually, i complained as well, because i think what you are presenting is nationalist crap that you should be ashamed of. i have respect for opinions differing from mine, but i have no respect for this kind of deliberate ignorance. your government is responsible for a lot of the blood-shed in xYu in the last years, and even if there is more than one side to this, and even if the albanian terrorists killed two serb policemen ... the serb terrorist government is about to wage war against the albanian population in kosovo after suppressing them for decades. during WW2, the germans used to have these ratios that 10 civilians should die for every soldier killed by partisans. i don't need to read your ranting on nettime to know that there are people who hold your opinion. there wouldn't be these kinds of conflicts if there weren't. -a btw, branka is not a soros-sponsored us-agent yet, but we hope that she will be soon ... ;-) Date: Fri, 06 Mar 1998 21:10:07
+0100 Dear Andreas, thanks for writing to me. I am sorry we can not discuss this publicly, because as you know I am cut off the Nettime list, without any warning. This seams a little bit fascistic to me. Now to answer
to you letter: I don't know
if you ever heard that other xYU republics in the beginning of conflicts
with Yugoslavian Army also had their paramilitary troops, like Albanians
now, and that they were armed from abroad. So the situation is very similar,
and I don't see any responsibility of an federal army to act against separatist
paramilitary terrorists. And I am not ignorant, nor stupid, nor craping.
This is the plain truth. And you just listen to lies of your German expansionist
propaganda. It is well known what Germans and Austrians did in the history
to innocent people and nations.
|