NATO's reign of terror in Kosovo
by Michel Chossudovsky
Double standards, lies, and murder
constitue American policy in Kosovo
MASSACRES OF CIVILIANS
While the World focuses on troop movements and war
crimes, the massacres of civilians in the wake of the
bombings have been casually dismissed as "justifiable
acts of revenge". In occupied Kosovo, "double
standards" prevail in assessing alleged war crimes.
The massacres directed against Serbs, ethnic
Albanians, Roma and other ethnic groups have been
conducted on the instructions of the military command
of the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA).
Yet because NATO ostensibly denies KLA
involvement, these so-called "unmotivated acts of
violence and retaliation" are not categorized as "war
crimes" and are therefore not included in the mandate
of the numerous FBI and Interpol police investigators
dispatched to Kosovo under the auspices of the Hague
War Crime's Tribunal (ICTY). Moreover, whereas
NATO has tacitly endorsed the self-proclaimed KLA
provisional government, KFOR --the international
security force in Kosovo-- has provided protection to
the KLA military commanders responsible for the
atrocities. In so doing both NATO and the UN Mission
have acquiesced to the massacres of civilians.
In turn, public opinion has been blatantly misled. In
portraying the massacres, the Western media has
casually overlooked the role of the KLA, not to
mention its pervasive links to organized crime. In the
words of National Security Advisor Samuel Berger,
"these people [ethnic Albanians] come back ... with
broken hearts and with some of those hearts filled
with anger" 1. While the massacres are seldom
presented as the result of "deliberate decisions" by
the KLA military command, the evidence (and history
of the KLA) amply confirm that these atrocities are
part of a policy of "ethnic cleansing" directed mainly
against the Serb population but also against the Roma,
Montenegrins, Goranis and Turks:
Serbian houses and business have been
confiscated, looted, or burned, and Serbs
have been beaten, raped, and killed. In one
of the more dramatic of incidents, KLA
troops ransacked a monastery, terrorized the
priest and a group of nuns with gunfire, and
raped at least one of the nuns. NATO's
inability to control the situation and provide
equal protection for all ethnic groups, and
its apparent inability or unwillingness to
fully disarm the KLA, has created a serious
situation for NATO troops...2
The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
(UNHCR), confirms in this regard that:
"more than 164,000 Serbs have left Kosovo
during the seven weeks since... the
NATO-led Kosovo Force (KFOR) entered the
province... A wave of arson and looting of
Serb and Roma homes throughout Kosovo
has ensued. Serbs and Roma remaining in
Kosovo have been subject to repeated
incidents of harassment and intimidation,
including severe beatings. Most seriously,
there has been a spate of murders and
abductions of Serbs since mid-June,
including the late July massacre of Serb
farmers" 3.
POLITICAL ASSASSINATIONS
Under NATO's regency, the KLA has also ordered
assassinations directed against political opponents
including "loyalist" ethnic Albanians and supporters
of the Kosovo Democratic League (KDL). These acts
--ordered by the self-proclaimed Provisional
Government of Kosovo (PGK)-- are being carried out
in a totally permissive environment. The leaders of
the KLA rather than being arrested for war crimes,
have been granted KFOR protection.
According to a report of the Foreign Policy Institute
(published during the bombings):
"...the KLA have [no] qualms about
murdering Rugova's collaborators, whom it
accused of the "crime" of moderation...
[T]he KLA declared Rugova a "traitor" - yet
another step toward eliminating any
competitors for political power within
Kosovo."4
Already in May, Fehmi Agani, one of Rugova's closest
collaborators in the Kosovo Democratic League
(KDL) was killed. The Serbs were blamed by NATO
spokesperson Jamie Shea for having assassinated
Agani. According to Skopje's paper Makedonija
Danas, Agani had been executed on the orders of the
KLA's self-appointed Prime Minister Hashim Thaci.5
"If Thaci actually considered Rugova a threat, he
would not hesitate to have Rugova removed from the
Kosovo political landscape."6
In turn, the KLA has abducted and killed numerous
professionals and intellectuals:
"Private and State properties are threatened,
home-and apartment-owners are evicted en
masse by force and threats, houses and
entire villages are burned, cultural and
religious monuments are destroyed... A
particularly heavy blow... has been the
violence against the hospital centre in
Pristina, the maltreatment and expulsion of
its professional management, doctors and
medical staff."7
Both NATO and the UN prefer to turn a blind eye.
UN Interim Administrator Bernard Kouchner (a
former French Minister of Health) and KFOR
Commander Sir Mike Jackson have established a
routine working relationship with Prime Minister
Hashim Thaci and KLA Chief of Staff Brigadier
General Agim Ceku.
ATROCITIES COMMITTED AGAINST
THE ROMA
Ethnic cleansing has also been directed against the
Roma (which represented prior to the conflict a
population group of 150,000 people). (According to
figures provided by the Roma Community in New
York). A large part of the Roma population has
already escaped to Montenegro and Serbia. In turn,
there are reports that Roma refugees --who had fled
by boat to Southern Italy-- have been expelled by the
Italian authorities.8 The KLA has also ordered the
systematic looting and torching of Romani homes and
settlements:
"All houses and settlements of Romani, like
2,500 homes in the residential area called
'Mahala" in the town of Kosovska
Mitrovica, have been looted and burnt
down".9
With regard to KLA atrocities committed against the
Roma, the same media distortions prevail. According
to the BBC: "Gypsies are accused by [Kosovar]
Albanians of collaborating in Serb brutalities, which
is why they've also become victims of revenge attacks.
And the truth is, some probably did." 10
INSTALLING A PARAMILITARY
GOVERNMENT
As Western leaders trumpet their support for
democracy, State terrorism in Kosovo has become an
integral part of NATO's post-war design. The KLA's
political role for the post-conflict period had been
mapped out well in advance. Prior to the Rambouillet
Conference, the KLA had been promised a central
role in the formation of a post-conflict government.
The "hidden agenda" consisted in converting the KLA
paramilitary into a legitimate and accomplished
civilian administration. According to US State
Department spokesman James Foley (February
1999):
"We want to develop a good relationship
with them [the KLA] as they transform
themselves into a politically-oriented
organization, ...[W]e believe that we have
a
lot of advice and a lot of help that we can
provide to them if they become precisely the
kind of political actor we would like to see
them become.'"11
In other words, Washington had already slated the
KLA "provisional government" (PGK) to run civilian
State institutions. Under NATO's "Indirect Rule", the
KLA has taken over municipal governments and
public services including schools and hospitals. Rame
Buja, the KLA "Minister for Local Administration"
has appointed local prefects in 23 out of 25
municipalities.12
Under NATO's regency, the KLA has replaced the
duly elected (by ethnic Albanians) provisional Kosovar
government of President Ibrahim Rugova. The
self-proclaimed KLA administration has branded
Rugova as a traitor declaring the (parallel) Kosovar
parliamentary elections held in March 1998 to be
invalid. This position has largely been upheld by the
Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe
(OSCE) entrusted by UNMIK with the post-war task
of "democracy _building" and "good governance". In
turn, OSCE officials have already established a
working rapport with KLA appointees.13
The KLA provisional government (PGK) is made up
of the KLA's political wing together with the
Democratic Union Movement (LBD), a coalition of
five opposition parties opposed to Rugova's
Democratic League (LDK). In addition to the position
of prime minister, the KLA controls the ministries of
finance, public order and defense. The KLA has a
controlling voice on the UN sponsored Kosovo
Transitional Council set up by Mr. Bernard Kouchner.
The PGK has also established links with a number of
Western governments.
Whereas the KLA has been spearheaded into running
civilian institutions (under the guidance of the OSCE),
members of the duly elected Kosovar (provisional)
government of the Democratic League (DKL) have
been blatantly excluded from acquiring a meaningful
political voice.
ESTABLISHING A KLA POLICE FORCE
TO "PROTECT CIVILIANS"
Under NATO occupation, the rule of law has visibly
been turned up side down. Criminals and terrorists are
to become law-enforcement officers. KLA troops
--which have already taken over police stations-- will
eventually form a 4,000 strong "civilian" police force
(to be trained by foreign police officers under the
authority of the United Nations) with a mandate to
"protect civilians". Canadian Prime Minister Jean
Chretien has already pledged Canadian support to the
formation of a civilian police force.14 The latter
--which has been entrusted to the OSCE– will
eventually operate under the jurisdiction of the KLA
controlled "Ministry of Public Order".
US MILITARY AID
Despite NATO's commitment to disarming the KLA,
the Kosovar paramilitary organisation is slated to be
transformed into a modern military force. So-called
"security assistance" has already been granted to the
KLA by the US Congress under the `Kosovar
Independence and Justice Act of 1999'. Start-up funds
of 20 million dollars will largely be " used for training
and support for their [KLA] established self-defense
forces."15 In the words of KLA Chief of Staff Agrim
Ceku:
"The KLA wants to be transformed into
something like the US National Guard, ...
we
accept the assistance of KFOR and the
international community to rebuild an army
according to NATO standards. ...These
professionally trained soldiers of the next
generation of the KLA would seek only to
defend Kosova. At this decisive moment, we
[the KLA] do not hide our ambitions; we
want the participation of international
military structures to assist in the pacific
and humanitarian efforts we are attempting
here" 16.
While the KLA maintains its links to the Balkans
narcotics trade which served to finance many of its
terrorist activities, the paramilitary organisation has
now been granted an official seal of approval as well
as "legitimate" sources of funding. The pattern is
similar to that followed in Croatia and in the Bosnian
Muslim-Croatian Federation where so-called "equip
and train" programs were put together by the
Pentagon. In turn, Washington's military aid package
to the KLA has been entrusted to Military
Professional Resources Inc (MPRI) of Alexandria,
Virginia, a private mercenary outfit run by high
ranking former US military officers.
MPRI's training concepts --which had already been
tested in Croatia and Bosnia– are based on imparting
"offensive tactics... as the best form of defence".17 In
the Kosovar context, this so-called "defensive
doctrine" transforms the KLA paramilitary into a
modern army without however eliminating its terrorist
makeup.18 The objective is to ultimately transform an
insurgent army into a modern military and police force
which serves the Alliance's future strategic objectives
in the Balkans. MPRI has currently "ninety-one
highly experienced, former military professionals
working in Bosnia & Herzegovina".19 The number of
military officers working on contract with the KLA
has not been disclosed.
FORMER CROATIAN GENERAL
APPOINTED KLA CHIEF OF STAFF
The massacres of civilians in Kosovo are not
disconnected acts of revenge by civilians or by
so-called "rogue elements" within the KLA as
claimed by NATO and the United Nations. They are
part of a consistent and coherent pattern. The intent
(and result) of the KLA sponsored atrocities have
been to trigger the "ethnic cleansing" of Serbs, Roma
and other minorities in Kosovo.
KLA Commander Agim Ceku referring to the killings
of 14 villagers at Gracko on July 24, claimed that:
"We [the KLA] do not know who did it, but I sincerely
believe these people have nothing to do with the
KLA."20 In turn, KFOR Lieutenant General Sir Mike
Jackson has commended his KLA counterpart,
Commander Agim Ceku for "efforts undertaken" to
disarm the KLA. In fact, very few KLA weapons have
been handed in. Moreover, the deadline for turning in
KLA weaponry has been extended. "I do not regard
this as noncompliance" said Commander Jackson in a
press conference, "but rather as an indication of the
seriousness with which General Ceku is taking this
important issue." 21
Yet what Sir Mike Jackson failed to mention is that
KLA Chief of Staff Commander Agim Ceku (although
never indicted as a war criminal) was (according to
Jane Defence Weekly June 10 1999) "one of the key
planners of the successful `Operation Storm'" led by
the Croatian Armed Forces against Krajina Serbs in
1995.
General Jackson --who had served in former
Yugoslavia under the United Nations Protection Force
(UNPROFOR)-- was fully cognizant of the activities
of the Croatian High Command during that period
including the responsibilities imparted to Brigadier
General Agim Ceku. In February 1999, barely a
month prior to the NATO bombings, Ceku left his
position as Brigadier General with the Croatian
Armed Forces to join the KLA as Commander in
Chief.
FROM KRAJINA TO KOSOVO: SHAPE
OF THINGS TO COME
According to the Croatian Helsinki Committee for
Human Rights, Operation Storm resulted in the
massacre of at least 410 civilians in the course of a
three day operation (4 to 7 August 1995). 22 An
internal report of The Hague War Crimes Tribunal
(leaked to the New York Times), confirmed that the
Croatian Army had been responsible for carrying out
"summary executions, indiscriminate
shelling of civilian populations and "ethnic
cleansing" in the Krajina region of
Croatia...."23
In a section of the report entitled "The Indictment.
Operation Storm, A Prima Facie Case.", the ICTY
report confirms that:
"During the course of the military offensive,
the Croatian armed forces and special police
committed numerous violations of
international humanitarian law, including
but not limited to, shelling of Knin and other
cities... During, and in the 100 days
following the military offensive, at least
150
Serb civilians were summarily executed, and
many hundreds disappeared....In a
widespread and systematic manner,
Croatian troops committed murder and
other inhumane acts upon and against
Croatian Serbs" 24.
US "GENERALS FOR HIRE"
The internal 150 page report concluded that it has
"sufficient material to establish that the three
[Croatian] generals who commanded the military
operation" could be held accountable under
international law. 25 The individuals named had been
directly involved in the military operation "in
theatre". Those involved in "the planning of
Operation Storm" were not mentioned:
"The identity of the "American general"
referred to by Fenrick [a Tribunal staff
member] is not known. The tribunal would
not allow Williamson or Fenrick to be
interviewed. But Ms. Arbour, the tribunal's
chief prosecutor, suggested in a telephone
interview last week that Fenrick's comment
had been 'a joking observation'. Ms. Arbour
had not been present during the meeting,
and that is not how it was viewed by some
who were there. Several people who were at
the meeting assumed that Fenrick was
referring to one of the retired U.S. generals
who worked for Military Professional
Resources Inc.... Questions remain about the
full extent of U.S. involvement. In the course
of the three-year investigation into the
assault, the United States has failed to
provide critical evidence requested by the
tribunal, according to tribunal documents
and officials, adding to suspicion among
some there that Washington is uneasy about
the investigation... The Pentagon, however,
has argued through U.S. lawyers at the
tribunal that the shelling was a legitimate
military activity, according to tribunal
documents and officials.26.
The Tribunal was attempting to hide what had already
been revealed in several press reports published in the
wake of Operation Storm. According to a US State
Department spokesman, MPRI had been helping the
Croatians "avoid excesses or atrocities in military
operations."27 . Fifteen senior US military advisers
headed by retired two star General Richard Griffitts
had been dispatched to Croatia barely seven months
before Operation Storm. 28 According to one report,
MPRI executive director General Carl E. Vuono:
"held a secret top-level meeting at Brioni Island, off
the coast of Croatia, with Gen. Varimar Cervenko, the
architect of the Krajina campaign. In the five days
preceding the attack, at least ten meetings were held
between General Vuono and officers involved in the
campaign..."29
According to Ed Soyster a senior MPRI executive and
former head of the Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA)
(interviewed by Time Magazine in early 1996):
"MPRI's role in Croatia is limited to
classroom instruction on military-civil
relations and doesn't involve training in
tactics or weapons. Other U.S. military men
say whatever MPRI did for the Croats--and
many suspect more than classroom
instruction was involved--it was worth every
penny. "Carl Vuono and Butch [Crosbie]
Saint are hired guns and in it for the
money," says Charles Boyd, a recently
retired four-star Air Force general who was
the Pentagon's No. 2 man in Europe until
July [1995]. "They did a very good job for
the Croats, and I have no doubt they'll do
a
good job in Bosnia. " 30.
THE HAGUE TRIBUNAL'S COVER UP
The untimely leaking of the ICTY's internal report on
the Krajina massacres barely a few days before the
onslaught of NATO's air raids on Yugoslavia was the
source of some embarrassment to the Tribunal's
Chief Prosecutor Louise Arbour. The Tribunal (ICTY)
attempted to cover up the matter and trivialize the
report's findings (including the alleged role of the US
military officers on contract with the Croatian Armed
Forces). Several Tribunal officials including American
Lawyer Clint Williamson sought to discredit the
Canadian Peace-keeping officers' testimony who
witnessed the Krajina massacres in 1995.31
Williamson, who described the shelling of
Knin as a "minor incident," said that the
Pentagon had told him that Knin was a
legitimate military target... The [Tribunal's]
review concluded by voting not to include
the
shelling of Knin in any indictment, a
conclusion that stunned and angered many
at the tribunal"...32
The findings of the Tribunal contained in the leaked
ICTY documents were downplayed, their relevance
was casually dismissed as "expressions of opinion,
arguments and hypotheses from various staff
members of the OTP during the investigative
process".33 According to the Tribunal's spokesperson
"the documents do not represent in any way the
concluded decisions of the Prosecutor." 34
The internal 150 page report has not been released.
The staff member who had leaked the documents is
(according to a Croatian TV report) no longer
working for the Tribunal. During the press
Conference, the Tribunal's spokesman was asked:
"about the consequences for the person who leaked
the information", Blewitt [the ICTY spokesman]
replied that he did not want to go into that. He said
that the OTP would strengthen the existing
procedures to prevent this from happening again,
however he added that you could not stop people from
talking". 35
THE USE OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS IN
CROATIA
The massacres conducted under Operation Storm
"set the stage" for the "ethnic cleansing" of at least
180,000 Krajina Serbs (according to estimates of the
Croatian Helsinki Committee and Amnesty
International). According to other sources, the
number of victims of ethnic cleansing in Krajina was
much larger.
Moreover, there is evidence that chemical weapons
had been used in the Yugoslav civil war (1991-95).36
Although there is no firm evidence of the use of
chemical weapons against Croatian Serbs, an ongoing
enquiry by the Canadian Minister of Defence
(launched in July 1999) points to the possibility of
toxic poisoning of Canadian Peace-keepers while on
service in Croatia between 1993 and 1995:
"There was a smell of blood in the air
during the past week as the media sensed
they had a major scandal unfolding within
the Department of National Defense over the
medical files of those Canadians who served
in Croatia in 1993. Allegations of destroyed
documents, a cover-up, and a defensive
minister and senior officers..." 37.
The official release of the Department of National
Defence (DND) refers to the possibility of toxic "soil
contamination" in Medak Pocket in 1993 (see below).
Was it "soil contamination" or something far more
serious? The criminal investigation by the Royal
Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) refers to the
shredding of medical files of former Canadian
peace-keepers by the DND. In other words, did the
DND have something to hide? The issue remains as to
what types of shells and ammunitions were used by
the Croatian Armed Forces -- i.e. were chemical
weapons used against Serb civilians?
OPERATION STORM: THE ACCOUNT
OF THE ROYAL CANADIAN REGIMENT
Prior to the onslaught, Croatian radio had previously
broadcasted a message by president Franjo Tudjman,
calling upon "Croatian citizens of Serbian ethnicity...
to remain in their homes and not to fear the Croatian
authorities, which will respect their minority rights".
38. Canadian peace-keepers of the Second Battalion
of the Royal 22nd Regiment witnessed the atrocities
committed by Croatian troops in the Krajina offensive
in September 1995:
"Any Serb who had failed to evacuate their
property were systematically "cleansed" by
roving death squads. Every abandoned
animal was slaughtered and any Serb
household was ransacked and torched". 39.
Also confirmed by Canadian peace-keepers was the
participation of German mercenaries in Operation
Storm:
Immediately behind the front-line Croatian
combat troops and German mercenaries, a
large number of hard-line extremists had
pushed into the Krajina.... Many of these
atrocities were carried out within the
Canadian Sector, but as the peacekeepers
were soon informed by the Croat authorities,
the UN no longer had any formal authority
in the region.40.
How the Germans mercenaries were recruited was
never officially revealed. An investigation by the
United Nations Human Rights Commission (UNHRC)
confirmed that foreign mercenaries in Croatia had in
some cases "been paid [and presumably recruited]
outside Croatia and by third parties"41
THE 1993 MEDAK POCKET MASSACRE
According to Jane Defence Weekly (10 June 1999),
Brigadier General Agim Ceku (now in charge of the
KLA) also "masterminded the successful HV
[Croatian Army] offensive at Medak" in September
1993. In Medak, the combat operation was entitled
"Scorched Earth" resulting in the total destruction of
the Serbian villages of Divoselo, Pocitelj and Citluk,
and the massacre of over 100 civilians.42
These massacres were also witnessed by Canadian
peace-keepers under UN mandate:
"As the sun rose over the horizon. It
revealed a Medak Valley engulfed in smoke
and flames. As the frustrated soldiers of
2PPCLI waited for the order to move
forward into the pocket, shots and screams
still rang out as the ethnic cleansing
continued.... About 20 members of the
international press had tagged along,
anxious to see the Medak battleground.
Calvin [a Canadian officer] called an
informal press conference at the head of the
column and loudly accused the Croats of
trying to hide war crimes against the Serb
inhabitants. The Croats started withdrawing
back to their old lines, taking with them
whatever loot they hadn't destroyed. All
livestock had been killed and houses
torched. French reconnaissance troops and
the Canadian command element pushed up
the valley and soon began to find bodies of
Serb civilians, some already decomposing,
others freshly slaughtered.... Finally, on
the
drizzly morning of Sept. 17, teams of UN
civilian police arrived to probe the
smouldering ruins for murder victims.
Rotting corpses lying out in the open were
catalogued, then turned over to the
peacekeepers for burial. 43.
The massacres were reported to the Canadian
Minister of Defence and to the United Nations:
Senior defence bureaucrats back in Ottawa
had no way of predicting the outcome of the
engagement in terms of political fallout.
To
them, there was no point in calling media
attention to a situation that might easily
backfire.... So Medak was relegated to the
memory hole - no publicity, no
recriminations, no official record. Except
for those soldiers involved, Canada's most
lively military action since the Korean War
simply never happened. 44
NATO'S POST-CONFLICT AGENDA IN
KOSOVO
Both the Medak Pocket massacre and Operation
Storm bear a direct relationship to the ongoing
security situation in Kosovo and the massacres and
ethnic cleansing committed by KLA troops. While the
circumstances are markedly different, several of
today's actors in Kosovo were involved (under the
auspices of the Croatian Armed Forces) in the
planning of both these operations. Moreover, the US
mercenary outfit MPRI which collaborated with the
Croatian Armed Forces in 1995 is currently on
contract with the KLA. NATO's casual response to
the appointment of Brigadier General Agim Ceku as
KLA Chief of Staff was communicated by Mr. Jamie
Shea in a Press Briefing in May:
"I have always made it clear, and you have
heard me say this, that NATO has no direct
contacts with the KLA. Who they appoint as
their leaders, that is entirely their own
affair. I don't have any comment on that
whatever.45
While NATO says it "has no direct contacts with the
KLA", the evidence confirms the opposite. Amply
documented, KLA terrorism has been installed with
NATO's tacit approval. The KLA had (according to
several reports) been receiving "covert support" and
training from the CIA and Germany's Bundes
Nachrichten Dienst (BND) since the mid-nineties.
Moreover, MPRI collaboration with the KLA
predates the onslaught of the bombing campaign.46
The building up of KLA forces was part of NATO
planning. Already by mid-1998, "covert support" had
been replaced by official ("overt") support by the
military Alliance in violation of UN Security Council
Resolution UNSCR 1160 of 31 March 1998 which
condemned: "...all acts of terrorism by the Kosovo
Liberation Army or any other group or individual and
all external support for terrorist activity in Kosovo,
including finance, arms and training."
NATO officials, Western heads of State and heads of
government, the United Nations Secretary General
Kofi Annan not to mention ICTY chief Prosecutor
Louise Arbour, were fully cognizant of General
Brigadier Agim Ceku's involvement in the planning of
Operation Storm and Operation Scorched Earth.
Canadian Major General Lewis McKenzie who
served under the United Nations confirmed that "the
same officer who masterminded the 1993 Medak
offensive in Croatia that saw Canadian soldiers using
deadly force to stop horrendous atrocities against Serb
civilians [had also] ordered the overrunning of lightly
armed UN outposts, in blatant contravention of
international law. His influence within the KLA does
not augur well for its trustworthiness during Kosovo's
political evolution". 47 Surely, some questions should
have been asked....
Yet visibly what is shaping up in the wake of the
bombings in Kosovo is the continuity of NATO's
operation in the Balkans. Military personnel and UN
bureaucrats previously stationed in Croatia and
Bosnia have been routinely reassigned to Kosovo.
KFOR Commander Mike Jackson had previously
been responsible --as IFOR Commander for
organizing the return of Serbs "to lands taken by
Croatian HVO forces in the Krajina offensive".48
And in this capacity General Mike Jackson had
"urged that the resettlement [of Krajina Serbs] not
[be] rushed to avoid tension [with the Croatians]"
while also warning returning Serbs "of the extent of
the [land] mine threat "49. In retrospect, recalling the
events of early 1996, very few Krajina Serbs were
allowed to return to their homes under the protection
of the United Nations. According to "Veritas" (a
Belgrade based organization of Serbian refugees from
Croatia), some 10-15,000 Serbs were able to resettle
in Croatia.
And a similar process is unfolding in Kosovo, --i.e. the
conduct of senior military officers conforms to a
consistent pattern, the same key individuals are now
involved in Kosovo. While token efforts are displayed
to protect Serb and Roma civilians, those who have
fled Kosovo are not encouraged to return under UN
protection... In post-war Kosovo, "ethnic cleansing"
implemented by the KLA has been accepted by the
"international community" as a "fait accompli"...
Moreover, while calling for democracy and "good
governance" in the Balkans, the US and its allies have
installed in Kosovo a paramilitary government with
links to organized crime. The foreseeable outcome is
the outright "criminalisation" of civilian State
institutions and the establishment of what is best
described as a "Mafia State". The complicity of
NATO and the Alliance governments (namely their
relentless support to the KLA) points to the de facto
"criminalisation" of KFOR and of the UN
peace-keeping apparatus in Kosovo. The donor
agencies and governments (e.g. the funds approved by
the US Congress in violation of several UN Security
Council resolutions) providing financial support to the
KLA are, in this regard, also "accessories" to the de
facto criminalisation of State institutions. Through the
intermediation of a paramilitary group (created and
financed by Washington and Bonn), NATO ultimately
bears the burden of responsibility for the massacres
and ethnic cleansing of civilians in Kosovo.
STATE TERROR AND THE "FREE
MARKET"
State terror and the "free market" seem to go hand
in hand. The concurrent "criminalisation" of State
institutions in Kosovo is not incompatible with the
West's economic and strategic objectives in the
Balkans. Notwithstanding the massacres of civilians,
the self-proclaimed KLA administration has
committed itself to establishing a "secure and stable
environment" for foreign investors and international
financial institutions. The Minister of Finance Adem
Grobozci and other representatives of the provisional
government invited to the various donor conferences
are all KLA appointees. In contrast, members of the
KDL of Ibrahim Rugova (duly elected in
parliamentary elections) were not even invited to
attend the Stabilisation Summit in Sarajevo in late
July.
"Free market reforms" are envisaged for Kosovo
under the supervision of the Bretton Woods
institutions largely replicating the structures of the
Rambouillet agreement. Article I (Chapter 4a) of the
Rambouillet Agreement stipulated that: "The
economy of Kosovo shall function in accordance with
free market principles". The KLA government will
largely be responsible for implementing these reforms
and ensuring that loan conditionalities are met.
In close liaison with NATO, the Bretton Woods
institutions had already analyzed the consequences of
an eventual military intervention leading to the
military occupation of Kosovo: almost a year prior to
the beginning of the War, the World Bank conducted
"simulations" which "anticipated the possibility of an
emergency scenario arising out of the tensions in
Kosovo". 50.
The eventual "reconstruction" of Kosovo financed by
international debt largely purports to transfer
Kosovo's extensive wealth in mineral resources and
coal to multinational capital. In this regard, the KLA
has already occupied (pending their privatization) the
largest coal mine at Belacevac in Dobro Selo
northwest of Pristina. In turn, foreign capital has its
eyes riveted on the massive Trepca mining complex
which constitutes "the most valuable piece of real
estate in the Balkans, worth at least $5 billion." 51.
The Trebca complex not only includes copper and
large reserves of zinc but also cadmium, gold, and
silver. It has several smelting plants, 17 metal
treatment sites, a power plant and Yugoslavia's
largest battery plant. Northern Kosovo also has
estimated reserves of 17 billion tons of coal and
lignite.
In the wake of the bombings, the management of
many of the State owned enterprises and public
utilities were taken over by KLA appointees. In turn,
the leaders of Provisional Government of Kosovo
(PGK) have become "the brokers" of multinational
capital committed to handing over the Kosovar
economy at bargain prices to foreign investors. The
IMF's lethal "economic therapy" will be imposed, the
provincial economy will be dismantled, agriculture will
be deregulated, local industrial enterprises which have
not been totally destroyed will be driven into
bankruptcy.
The most profitable State assets will eventually be
transferred into the hands of foreign capital under the
World Bank sponsored privatization program.
"Strong economic medicine" imposed by external
creditors will contribute to further boosting a criminal
economy (already firmly implanted in Albania) which
feeds on poverty and economic dislocation.
"The Allies will work with the rest of the
international community to help rebuild
Kosovo once the crisis is over: The
International Monetary Fund and Group of
Seven industrialized countries are among
those who stand ready to offer financial help
to the countries of the region. We want to
ensure proper co-ordination of aid and help
countries to respond to the effects of the
crisis. This should go hand in hand with the
necessary structural reforms in the
countries affected -- helped by budget
support from the international
community.52
Moreover, the so-called "reconstruction" of the
Balkans by foreign capital will signify multi-billion
contracts to foreign firms to rebuild Kosovo's
infrastructure. More generally, the proposed
"Marshall Plan" for the Balkans financed by the
World Bank and the European Development Bank
(EBRD) as well as private creditors will largely
benefit Western mining, petroleum and construction
companies while fuelling the region's external debt
well into the third millennium.
And Kosovo is slated to reimburse this debt through
the laundering of dirty money. Yugoslav banks in
Kosovo will be closed down, the banking system will
be deregulated under the supervision of Western
financial institutions. Narco-dollars from the
multi-billion dollar Balkans drug trade will be recycled
towards servicing the external debt as well as
"financing" the costs of "reconstruction". The
lucrative flow of narco-dollars thus ensures that
foreign investors involved in the "reconstruction"
program will be able reap substantial returns. In turn,
the existence of a Kosovar "narco-State" ensures the
orderly reimbursement of international donors and
creditors. The latter are prepared to turn blind eye.
They have a tacit vested interest in installing a
government which facilitates the laundering of drug
money.
The pattern in Kosovo is, in this regard, similar to that
observed in neighboring Albania. Since the early
1990s (culminating with the collapse of the financial
pyramids in 1996-97), the IMF's reforms have
impoverished the Albanian population while
spearheading the national economy into bankruptcy.
The IMF's deadly economic therapy transforms
countries into open territories. In Albania and to a
lesser extent Macedonia, it has also contributed to
fostering the growth of illicit trade and the
criminalisation of State institutions.
(Prepared for and presented at the New York hearing
of the Independent Commission of Inquiry to
Investigate U.S./NATO War Crimes Against The
People of Yugoslavia, called by former Attorney
General Ramsey Clark, July 31, 1999)
ENDNOTES
1. Jim Lehrer News Maker Interview, PBS, 26 July
1999.
2. Stratfor Commentary, "Growing Threat of Serbian
Paramilitary Action in Kosovo", 29 July 1999
3. Human Rights Watch, 3 August 1999.
4. See Michael Radu, "Don't Arm the KLA", CNS
Commentary from the Foreign Policy Research
Institute, 7 April, 1999).
5. Tanjug Press Dispatch, 14 May 1999
6. Stratfor Comment, "Rugova Faced with a Choice
of Two Losses", Stratfor, 29 July 1999.
7. Federal Ministry for Foreign Affairs, Yugoslav
Daily Survey, Belgrade, 29 June 1999.
8. Hina Press Dispatch, Zagreb, 26 July 1999
9. Ibid.
10. BBC Report, London, 5 July 1999.
11. New York Times, 2 February 1999
12. Financial Times, London, 4 August 1999.
13. See Organization for Security and Co-operation
in
Europe, Mission in Kosovo, Decision 305, Permanent
Council, 237th Plenary Meeting, PC Journal No.
237,
Agenda item 2, Vienna, 1 July 1999 .
14 Statement at the Sarajevo Summit, 31 July
1999.
15. 106th Congress, April 15, HR 1425.
16. Interview with KLA Chief of Staff Commander
Agim Ceku, Kosovapress, 31 July 1999
17.See Tammy Arbucki, Building a Bosnian Army",
Jane International Defence Review, August 1997.
18. Ibid.
19. Military Professional Resources, Inc, "Personnel
Needs", http://www.mpri.com/current/personnel.htm
20. Associated Press Report
21. Ibid.
22. The actual number of civilians killed or
missing
was much larger.
23. Quoted in Raymond Bonner, War Crimes Panel
Finds Croat Troops Cleansed the Serbs, New York
Times, 21 March 1999).
24. Ibid.
25. Ibid.
26 Raymond Bonner, op cit.
27. Ken Silverstein, "Privatizing War", The
Nation,
New York, 27 July 1997.
28. See Mark Thompson et al, "Generals for Hire",
Time Magazine, 15 January 1996, p. 34.
29. Quoted in Silverstein, op cit.
30. Mark Thompson et al, op cit.
31. Raymond Bonner, op cit:
32. Ibid.
33. ICTY Weekly Press Briefing, 24 March 1999).
34. Ibid.
35. Ibid
36. See inter alia Reuters dispatch, 21 October
1993
on the use of chemical grenades, a New York
Times
report on 31 October 1992 on the use of poisoned
gas).
37. Lewis MacKenzie, "Giving our soldiers the
benefit of the doubt", National Post, 2 August
1999
38. Slobodna Dalmacija, Split, Croatia, August
5
1996.
39. Scott Taylor and Brian Nolan, The Sunday
Sun,
Toronto, 2 November 1998.
40. Ibid.
41. United Nations Commission on Human Rights,
Fifty-first session, Item 9 of the provisional
agenda,
Geneva, 21 December 1994).
42. (See Memorandum on the Violation of the
Human
and Civil Rights of the Serbian People in the
Republic
of Croatia,
http://serbianlinks.freehosting.net/memorandum.htm)
43. Excerpts from the book of Scott Taylor and
Brian
Nolan published in the Toronto Sun, 1 November
1998.
44. Ibid.
45. NATO Press Briefing, 14 May 1999.
46. For further details see Michel Chossudovsky,
Kosovo `Freedom Fighters' Financed by Organized
Crime, CAQ, Spring-Summer 1999.
47.Lewis McKenzie, "Soldier's View Nato Should
Disarm the KLA Before It's Too Late', The
Vancouver Sun, June 12, 1999.
48. Jane's Defence Weekly, Vol 25, No. 7, 14
February
1996.
49. Ibid.
50. World Bank Development News, Washington,
27
April 1999.
51. New York Times, July 8, 1998, report by
Chris
Hedges.
52. Statement by Javier Solano, Secretary General
of
NATO, published in The National Post, Toronto
May
1999.
C Copyright by Michel Chossudovsky, Ottawa, August 1999
(Michel Chossudovsky is Professor of Economics at
the University of Ottawa and author of The
Globalization of Poverty, Impacts of IMF and World
Bank Reforms, Third World Network, Penang and
Zed Books, London, 1997)
|