U.S. cruelty toward Iraq
by Charley Reese
Try explaining to an Iraqi mother why her
child is dead
An Iraqi mother has a question for us Americans:
"Why are you killing my innocent child?"
Well, what's your answer? Why are we
killing her innocent child and the innocent
children of thousands of Iraqi families?
Why are we destroying Iraq?
Before we came, Iraq had one of the
highest living standards in the Arab world,
with an extensive health-care system, clean
and abundant drinking water,
sewage-treatment plants, electric
power-generation plants, free education
for all, a network of social services and a
thriving intellectual and cultural life.
Today the country is in ruins. We have
wreaked more death and desolation than
the Mongol invaders.
Why? Is it because our politicians say
Iraq's president, Saddam Hussein, is a bad
person? But how could the 500,000 Iraqi
children we've already killed have
overthrown him?
George Bush and the U.S. Army failed to
overthrow him. Two separate rebellions
instigated by the Central Intelligence
Agency failed to overthrow him.
Innumerable assassination attempts have
not so much as put a scratch on him. So
why do we expect that killing 4,500 Iraqi
children per month is going to overthrow
him?
By the bye, those numbers of dead children
are United Nations numbers, not Iraqi. All
you liberals so in love with world
government must surely believe the United
Nations. The question posed by the Iraqi
mother was posed to a Canadian member
of parliament, Svend Robinson, who wrote
an article about his second trip to Iraq that
was published by the Globe and Mail.
This mother had just been told by an Iraqi
doctor that her sick baby was doomed.
They had no medicine.
Robinson points out the absurd and
hypocritical restrictions the United Nations
committee places on the money Iraq is
allowed to earn from selling limited
amounts of oil. These restrictions have
prevented Iraq from buying the medicines
and other basics it needs. Iraq was told,
for example, it could not import cloth,
which it wanted to do to provide jobs for
unemployed seamstresses sewing sheets
for hospital beds. Oh, no, the cloth might
be put to military use. Children have no
pencils. After all, graphite is a dual-use
commodity, and so it goes.
The fault is yours and mine. It is our
government that insists on maintaining an
economic embargo nine years after the last
Iraqi soldier left Kuwait. We also continue
to conduct an ongoing undeclared and
unconstitutional war by bombing northern
and southern Iraq on a weekly basis.
Not only is this policy cruel, vicious,
immoral and a war crime by any rational
definition, it is also not in America's
national interests. Even the heads of Arab
governments who don't like Saddam
Hussein are finding it increasingly difficult
as their own people grow angrier and
angrier about the unjustified suffering
being imposed on innocent Iraqi civilians.
I attribute the U.S. cruelty toward Iraq to
pure malice. I do so because I know that
people in Washington are not so stupid as
to believe that an embargo that has failed
for nine years is suddenly going to work. I
know that they are not so stupid as to fail
to realize that the embargo in fact
strengthens Hussein politically and
enriches him materially. He gets rich
because his government controls the
smuggling. I know that people in
Washington do not believe that Iraq has
any hidden cache of weapons that would
threaten anyone. They know full well that
the only country in the Middle East with a
large store of weapons of mass destruction
is Israel.
This insane policy has sewn a harvest of
hatred that innocent Americans will be
reaping for the next hundred years. Unless
you are willing to confront that Iraqi
mother and tell her to her face that it's
necessary for her child to die, you ought to
take a stand against the embargo.
Published in The Orlando Sentinel, January
2000
|